Colorful source...

I believe that in this story there were very poor editors of the paper. First off the person who wrote the article should have edited and improved almost all of the article before it even went to the main editor. Also later down the line when the paper editor got the paper, he should have made the story completely flawless before it went to the public. And finally I believe that the source must be angry at the Newspaper for disgracing and misspelling their name. And they probably wouldn't let them quote them again.